Whether it’s a bigger display or the addition of heart rate technology, Fitbit has a history of making incremental changes within its line of fitness wearables. The newly released Fitbit Alta HR is just the latest example of that.
While this strategy helps the company push out more products than just about every competitor, many of Fitbit’s activity trackers and fitness watches end up resembling each other.
It’s hard to bash uniformity when it appeals to the masses, but these similarities can make picking the right product more difficult for consumers. That’s where WearableZone comes in.
If you’re looking to compare the Fitbit Alta HR vs. the Charge 2, here’s everything you need to know before deciding which fitness tracker to buy.
Fitbit Alta HR vs. Charge 2: Features
Activity tracking and sleep tracking are pretty standard across all Fitbit models. Both the Alta HR and the Charge 2 measure steps, calories burned, and distance, but the latter also tracks floors climbed. According to Fitbit’s website the Alta HR and the Charge 2 will both track advanced sleeping metrics following an impending app update.
In terms of exercise features, the Fitbit Charge 2 has the edge. Both trackers have automatic exercise detection, but the Charge 2 also includes multi-sport options and offers more insight into your health and fitness level by providing a cardio fitness score. The Alta HR also doesn’t have a side button, so you can’t manually start an exercise like you can on the Charge 2.
The most notable difference between the Fitbit Alta and the Alta HR is the addition of continuous heart rate tracking. The Alta HR displays your real-time target rate zone during your workout and also lets you monitor your resting heart rate. Fitbit’s PurePulse heart rate tech is also available on the Charge 2.
Fitbit Alta HR vs. Charge 2: Design
According to Fitbit, the Alta HR is the world’s slimmest wristband with continuous heart rate tracking. The device closely resembles the design of the original Alta, which is arguably Fitbit’s most attractive wearable. The Charge 2 is by no means bulky, but it can’t really compete against the slender appeal of the Alta HR.
Both devices have a monochrome touchscreen, come in a variety of colors, and have interchangeable bands. The Charge 2’s display is bigger and easier to read, but that is its only real advantage in the design department.
Fitbit made no mention of improved water-resistance in its press release on the Alta HR, so it’s probably safe to assume that, like the original Alta, the device is showerproof. The Charge 2 is splashproof, but isn’t suitable for use in the shower.
Fitbit Alta HR vs. Charge 2: Battery And Price
Fitbit managed to bump the Alta HR’s battery life up to seven days, which is two days more than the original Alta offered. The Charge 2 typically lasts for five days — which is respectable — but an extra 48 hours definitely adds value.
Priced at $149.95 each, the Fitbit Alta HR and the Charge 2 are two of the most affordable fitness trackers on the market. Accessories cost extra, but both of these devices offer essentially the same selection.
Fitbit Alta HR vs. Charge 2: The Bottom Line
Think of the Fitbit Alta HR vs. Charge 2 debate as a question of form vs. function. Do you value a sleeker, more attractive design, or better exercise features? Since you still get Fitbit’s amazing app no matter what, that’s the only real question you have to answer.